Home

What Precipitated the Battle of Rhode Island?

Leave a comment

Tomorrow we honor those who participated in the Battle of Rhode Island with a Sunset Salute at Butts Hill Fort. Why did we have a battle? What was the spark? Over the past week I have heard an historian and a US Senator tell us that it was initiated by the British. I have been working on a role playing activity to let students and adults experience the decision making that principals in the Battle of Rhode Island had to make in the heat of the action. I like to draw from primary sources as I provide background material to the decisions that had to be made. Drawing from the diary of British soldier Frederick Mackenzie, I believe that the British were reacting to the retreat that they discovered that the Americans had already started overnight on August 28th.

Sunset Salute 2024

“As soon as the day broke this Morning and we could see as far as the Enemys Encampment it was observed that their tents were struck; I went immediately on top of Dudleys house, and when it grew lighter, I could plainly perceive that the Rebels had struck their whole Camp, and had marched off; hardly a man was to be seen in their Batteries or Trenches. I rode as fast as possible to General Pigot’s quarters in Newport and informed him of it, and returned to the Camp with his orders for all the troops to get under arms with the utmost expedition. The General came to Irishes Redoubt by the time the Troops were assembled, and being satisfied that the Rebels had quitted their position, he gave orders for a part of the Army to march out, in three Columns, to pursue them, but to advance with caution, and not bring on an Action with a part of our force.” Mackenzie’s diary August 29, 1778

The British didn’t decide to go on the attack against the American Siege of Newport. Mackenzie notes that the British were “to advance with caution, and not bring on an Action with a part of our force.” The British found that Americans had left their positions and General Pigot decided to go after them to capture the American Army before it could retreat off Aquidneck Island. The goal of the Americans was to get their soldiers and equipment safely to Tiverton so they could fight another day. The American aim in the battle was to push the British and German (Hessian) troops back so that a successful retreat could be made. They were in an untenable position once it was clear that the French were not coming back to aide in the plans of the Rhode Island Campaign. The Americans were not trying for a full engagement either.

Butts Hill Fort December 2024/December 1778

1 Comment

The Butts Hill Fort is emerging through the efforts of the Butts Hill Fort Restoration Committee this year.

Image of Butts Hill Fort – first day in Winter by Paul Murphy.

Butts Hill Fort 2024

“As we close 2024, we can report that the Butts Hill Fort complex has now emerged as a truly open and accessible historic campus. One with fully connected and improved pathways circumnavigating the site, while offering full visibility of the steeply sloping historic earthworks–from the outside looking in–for the first time in many decades. Moreover, the preservation clearing work has also opened up the site to be more understandable as Revolutionary War Era Aquidneck Island’s central defensive feature with improved view corridors to key battle landmarks such as Quaker, Turkey and Durfee hills to the south, and Howland’s Ferry, Tiverton and the Sakonnet to the east. (From: Butts Hill Fort 2024 Southern Earthworks Improvement Project Completion Report)

Butts Hill Fort 1778

The December after the Rhode Island Campaign was a harsh one. The British had systematically gathered all the fuel for fires on Aquidneck Island. At first the British and Hessians (Germans) felled the trees closest to their camps. The Hessians had a camp above Fogland Ferry. They continued to cut further away from their camps until there were no trees to cut and burn. British officer Frederick Mackenzie records that they then turned to cutting down orchards next on Common Fence Point and other locations. After the orchards, all other sources of wood were eyed. Vacant houses, wood carriages, and even wooden farm tools went into the wood supply.

Mackenzie writes on December 6th, 1778: “Every step is being taken to supply fuel: All the timber trees on the island are cutting down and the old wharves will be broken up.” Vacant houses were taken apart and the wood was used for fuel. Rail fences were taken apart and burned. On December 13th Mackenzie’s diary entry reads: “All the carriages that can be collected on the Island are employed in bringing in the wood which is cut by the party out on the island.” Turf” was cut on Brenton’s Neck and used for fuel. When the island’s wood supply was exhausted, they sent fleets to collect wood on Conanicut, Block Island and Long Island.

On Christmas Day of 1778 a blizzard began that lasted until December 28th. Hessian soldier Johann Dohla records in this diary: “26 December: A frightful snow fell here, accompanied by strong winds and a violent snowstorm such that we could hardly remain in our houses because of the snow. Tonight a Hessian sergeant got stuck in the snow near Quaker Hill and froze to death.” In another diary Hessian soldier Stephen Popp records the snow depth to be three or four feet. Mackenzie records drifts of up to 20 feet.

Portsmouth residents were huddled in their homes on Christmas Day of 1778. The mostly Quaker residents would not have had grand celebrations anyway. Christmas was yet another day to do God’s work.

Photo by Paul Murphy

Tackling the Question: Did the American Militia have fortifications at Butts Hill in 1776?

Leave a comment

I am working on a simple timeline for Butts Hill Fort that might go into signage sometime. There are a lot of dates I have firmly determined, but I am stumped on an origin date and credit to which side first began to construct fortifications.

I am not a military historian, but John Robertson is. He credits the British with the first fortification in December of 1776. One reason I have believed that the American militia had to have created some fortifications is notations on the Huntington Library’s map of North Portsmouth. The note reads “made in 1776.” The British did not invade Aquidneck Island until December 8th, 1776. They would have had to work quickly in the cold winter to construct a battery that quickly.

Robertson believes that when the British arrived they found only two American fortifications and they were by the ferries.

Our best resource on British activities in Occupied Portsmouth is the diary of Frederick Mackenzie. Unfortunately Mackenzie was away from the island for the beginning months of 1777, but we have his accounts of December 1776. His account of troop distribution on December 17th doesn’t show any troops stationed at “Windmill Hill” (Americans called it Butts Hill). Those mentioned were “At Bristol ferry house,” (which would have been close to the Commons area today) detached to a house at the point (probably Common Fence Point), Town Pond, at the Neck and at the road to Howland’s Bridge.

Mackenzie diary on December 30 mentions that the British took over a fort that had been constructed by the American up the hill at Bristol Ferry. The notation here specifically mentions that they Rebels built this fortification in 1775. His diaries mention the hard frosts the British encountered so I imagined that digging for battery building would have been hard to accomplish.

After a being away in New York, Mackenzie mentions “Windmill Hill” June 3, 1777.

” A Picquet of one of the Regiments on Windmill, is ordered to reiRnforce the advance posts every evening ’til further orders.” What happened from January until June is missing in the diary.

D.K. Abbass writes that the American Militia had a fortification on the hill. I have tried to find confirmations when I research the Rhode Island Militia. Although Portsmouth did have an active militia, I can’t find mentions of specific use of the hill. I have looked at locations of signal beacons. Butts Hill would be the perfect place to put a beacon. I know there were reports of a beacon in Portsmouth, but I cannot find a specific mention of the Butts Hill site.

Readers – help me write the origin line.

1776 Americans

1776 British

1777 British

I am aware that as we research and find other sources, there might be a change in how we write an origin of the fort. But for now….I have to put something down.

Maps as an Information Source : Argomaps – Map of the Seconnet Passage

Leave a comment

I have come across an excellent source that gives us easy access to many of the maps of the Revolutionary Rhode Island era. https://www.argomaps.org/about/ is the link to this great source.

From their website:

ARGO: American Revolutionary Geographies Online is a new project led by the Leventhal Map and Education Center at the Boston Public Library and the George Washington Presidential Library at Mount Vernon. Leveraging new technology and the recent drive by many museums, libraries, and archives to digitize their collections, the portal collates digitized maps of North America made between 1750 and 1800 into a single user-friendly portal. In addition to providing users from many backgrounds with easy, intuitive access to beautiful high-resolution images, ARGO seeks to give users of all kinds the tools they need to learn and understand through interpretive essays, curated collections, classroom materials, and more. As a platform for scholarship, education, and exploration, the goal of ARGO is to make the rich visual legacy of our Revolutionary past accessible to the public as never before.”

ARGO’s Advice on using maps as a primary source.

Our number one piece of advice? Take time to look. Just as you would read and reread any other primary source document, be sure to examine your selected map. You can look over the map with the following questions in mind:

What does the map focus on?
How did the maker get you to focus? Did they use color? Are some things larger than others (scale)? What is at the center of the map? What features are accompanied by text?
What is overlooked? What is unlabeled, at the edges, or missing altogether?
How is the map intended to be used? To show political boundaries? Navigation? Sharing data? Depicting a particular place for promotion or propaganda?

What i do:

  1. I always look at the cataloguing information. It usually gives me such information as who the mapmaker was, when was it made, size, etc. Who the mapmaker was can tell us something about the intention of the map.
  2. I do look at the whole map, but I also break it down and specifically take note of what is in sections. Usually I look at the map in four sections. That helps me to notice minor details that may be important.
  3. I try to find a map of the same location today. Names change. McCorrie Point is frequently referred to as “Sandy Point” at the time.
  4. I always look for detail like the compass for orientation, scale, and legend. If this map is a rough sketch, these items might not be present.

Here is an example of how I work with a map that is new to me.

Checking out the bibliographic information.

What information can I cull?

Author: signed H.C. – this is in the Henry Clinton collection

Title: Taken from the back of the map.

Size: about 16 by 13 inches.

Materials: Pen and ink

Notes: Depth soundings are listed. Are they in fathoms? At one location the “Feet” is listed. American and British redoubts are included.

Now I have some information to bring to viewing the actual map. https://www.argomaps.org/maps/commonwealth-oai:hd76wz10d/

My observations: Although this map has a scale and a compass, it doesn’t have a legend, maker’s name or date. It seems to be a utilitarian map prepared for those defending the East coast of the Sakonnet. The passage depths listed and the scale helps defenders pinpoint locations where the Americans are most likely to cross. There is a special note about the redoubt at the Mill Pond – how it is armed and what weapons they have. As I expected, “Sandy Point” on the map is what we call McCorrie Point. There is even a tracing of what the point is like at low tide. American and British redoubts are listed. It would be good to compare them to other maps to get a sense of the dating of this map. The ferry locations are also listed.

Lafayette and Silas Talbot: the Pigot Plot

Leave a comment

We tend to think of the Rhode Island Campaign ending as the Americans retreated to Tiverton. I have been researching the movements of Lafayette in Rhode Island and I am more aware of the actions of the Continental troops on the East and West Bays directly after the retreat. Lafayette wrote letters that provide us with clues to what was happening in the East Bay. The Americans were successful in moving their troops and equipment off Aquidneck Island, but the decision of the French to leave for Boston to repair their ships left bitter feelings. Lafayette had an idea for a small victory to boost morale. On September 8th, 1778 he wrote to Silas Talbot . I am quoting the letter, but phrasing some of it in more modern language.

Sir,

The reputation which you have already acquired by your zeal and skill in the artificial way (as a mechanic in the military), leads me to communicate to you a plan where I think some success could be obtained. I wish to have heavy and strong scows upon each of them a twenty-four pounder would be fixed and then by a calm night, attack an English frigate who lies upon the North end of the island. The directions we could take should prevent her giving us any broadside before receiving many shots directed in such a way as to annoy them extremely.

In the same time she would be busy in her defense I wish two or four fire boats full of fascines, tar, old muskets, and bombs could be directed to the other side so as to enflame her.

If you believe, sir, such a scheme might succeed, I would be obliged to you to come immediately from Providence with such artificial provisions as would enable us to try the experiment without loss of time. You could take down two or three or more large scows or ferry boats who would extremely well do the business for fixing cannon on them. That affair must be kept very secret. With the greatest and more sincere esteem I have the honor to be dear sir your most obedient servant.

Silas Talbot did follow through with Lafayette’s idea. In coming blogs I will give more background on the adventures of Talbot and his daring exploits.

Letter taken from Lafayette in the Age of the American Revolution. Edited by Stanley J. Idzerda.

When Did Butts Hill Fort Begin?

Comments Off on When Did Butts Hill Fort Begin?

Subscribe to continue reading

Subscribe to get access to the rest of this post and other subscriber-only content.

Occupied Portsmouth: Fogland Ferry Fortifications

1 Comment

Erich A. O’D. Taylor’s pamphlet “Campaign on Rhode Island 1778” is among the resources in Jim Garman’s collection. It is richly illustrated with woodcuts by noted artist John Norman Benson. We always have to doublecheck the information in older histories, but I found some interesting information in this source that I believe is worth sharing. Some of the information is based on the diary of a Hessian soldier (Johann Conrad Döhla).

On October 22, 1777 there were rumors of a landing on Fogland. American General Spencer did not try that, but British General Pigott strengthened the works at Butts Hill, Fogland Ferry and Lawton’s Valley in Portsmouth. He enclosed Newport with enceinte (encircling walls), cutting off even the main roads with gates that were locked at night. This line was first manned December 17, 1777. NOTE: This confirms what I read in a letter by Mrs. Bannister in Desrosiers, The Banisters of Rhode Island in the American Revolution: Liberty and the Costs of Loyalties.

Turning to the Fogland Ferry area off Glen Road:

Ferries had crossed between the Glen area and Fogland in Tiverton since the 1640s. This was another narrow spot on the Sakonnet shore and the British considered this a very vulnerable spot. Barracks and defensive fortifications were constructed there.

Taylor wrote:
“The commander at Fogland Ferry had no small task before him to safeguard the nearby farms. It is interesting to learn therefore that this important position was usually assigned to Hessian regiments and was so well defended and its duties so well executed that the inhabitants complimented the commanders when they were relieved and returned to town. Among those who returned thanks to Captain Baron de Malsburg of the regiment Ansbach-Bayreuth on his leaving this post are to be found – Mr. Bowler, Restcome Sanford, Elisha Coggeshall, George Martin, Jonathan Davenport, John Lawton, Giles Slocum, George Taber, Giles Lawton and John Sanford… The farmers thoroughly understood the Hessian soldiers who came of a range of agriculturalists like themselves. During the quiet summers of 77 and 79 when no ‘assault was intended on the city,’ many of these Hessians hired themselves out to farmers, working for the small wage of (about 51 cents ) a day.”

Metcalf Bowler, Giles Slocum, John Sanford and others did indeed have farms in that area. The idea that the Hessians helped out on the farms is something new to me. I will be able to read Dohla’s diary and I will look for sources to confirm this. Metcalf Bowler, we discovered later, was acting as a British spy. Taylor hints that there were Loyalists among the Portsmouth farmers, but with the severe damage done to the farms during the Occupation I doubt many Portsmouth farmers appreciated the British Occupation.

An Occupied Island

Leave a comment

A general Introduction:

The British had ample reason to invade and occupy Aquidneck Island (called Rhode Island at that time). Newport had a fine harbor from which the British fleet could raid up and down the coast. It would enable them to blockade ships carrying supplies from abroad that were needed by the Americans. On December 8, 1776, British General Prescott landed at Weaver’s Cove. The American militiamen were unable to mount a defense and they escaped by using the ferries to Bristol and Tiverton.

Des Barres Map 1776. Note Weaver’s Cove landing site top left.

The British Occupation of Rhode Island would last until October of 1779. Life for the residents deteriorated throughout that time. There were different experiences for those who lived in Newport and those who lived in the farmlands of Middletown and Portsmouth. Newport had more British sympathizers and life for them was good at first. The well to do and British enjoyed concerts, dances, card parties, and Christmas concerts after the British first arrived in 1776. In 1777 daily routines continued. The occupiers took over houses, shops, wharves, and farms. The British and Hessians came with wives and children and all needed food, supplies, housing and heat. The residents competed with the British for scare items. The British took hay and confiscated cattle and livestock. Residents could hunt birds, catch fish and collect shellfish. The British collected boats and guns. The longer the Occupation lasted, the harder it was on those in the maritime trades such as coopers, sailors, rope makers, etc. Wharves were pulled up for fire wood. Merchants had no supplies coming in so they had little to sell.

Local citizens couldn’t count on growing food for their families. Gardens were raided, fruit was plucked from trees and potatoes were dug up by British soldiers. There was no freedom of movement. Women could travel a little more freely at first, but later they needed passes to leave town. The border of Newport and the rest of the island was gated and locked There was no free press or local government. Births, deaths, marriages were not recorded and Newport lost its property records when the British shipped them to New York and they were ruined by water.

Destruction was even more disastrous when the French fleet was arriving in August of 1778. In creating defensive works. the British demolished homes, chopped down orchards and trees for abatis (a defensive obstacle formed by felled trees with sharpened branches facing the enemy.). Conditions worsened after the Battle of Rhode Island and through to October of 1779 when the British left the island.

Resources:

A chart of the harbour of Rhode Island and Narraganset Bay surveyed in pursuance of directions from the Lords of Trade to His Majesty’s surveyor general for the northern district of North America : published at the request of the Right Honourable Lord Viscount Howe / by J.F.W. Des Barres, Esqr., 20th July 1776.

The Banisters of Rhode Island in the American Revolution: Liberty and the Costs of Loyalties
by Marian Mathison Desrosiers, Dec 14, 2020. The Bannisters lived through Occupation in Newport and this book provides insights.

Portsmouth Women: Enduring a “Distressed Situation”

Leave a comment

As the memorial stone at Butts Hill Fort reads, it is important for us to honor the “memory of those brave men who” fought in the Battle of Rhode Island”. It is also important for us to remember the Portsmouth women and their families who endured almost three years of British Occupation from December of 1776 to October of 1779. When the Portsmouth Town Council was able to meet again in 1779, the members pleaded with the state to have pity on us because the town was in a “Distressed Situation.” As I research this Revolutionary Era in Portsmouth history, the plight of Portsmouth women and their families was indeed disstressed.

What was Portsmouth like when the British came? The diary of British soldier Frederick Mackenzie provides a rosy picture. “There is a hill about 7 miles from Newport, and on the Eastern side of this Island called Quaker Hill, from there being a Quaker meeting-house on it, from whence there is a very fine view of all the N. part of the Island, and the beautiful bays and inlets, with the distant view of towns, farms, and cultivated lands intermixed with woods, together with the many views of the adjacent waters, contribute to make this, even at this bleak season of the year, the finest, most diversified, and extensive prospect I have seen in America.” This fine prospect did not last long under British military control. Much has been written about Occupied Newport, but the situation in Portsmouth had its own set of troubles. At times citizens were allowed to leave the island, but if you were a Portsmouth farm family you stayed to work and protect your farm. There were many Loyalists in the commercial port of Newport, but the majority of families in Portsmouth leaned towards the Rebel side. Only about ten percent of Portsmouth citizens left the island.

What happened to Portsmouth women and their families when the British arrived? British maps from the Revolutionary Era give us some idea.

  1. Some families lost their homes. For example, the British fortified Bristol Ferry and they tore down homes that blocked their vision of the ferry landing. Some houses were taken over as barracks for troops or as housing for officers and generals.
  2. Almost all families lost their trees and orchards. As time went by just about every tree on the island was cut down for firewood. The families were left in the cold while the British warmed their troops.
  3. Farm families lost their livestock. There were many soldiers to be fed. Mackenzie’s diary says the British left families with a means of feeding themselves. They could keep one gun to hunt birds and they could keep a boat for fishing.
  4. The British took just about every wagon and wooden farm tool. Wooden vehicles were used by the British for carrying loads, and almost anything wooden was burned for fuel.
  5. Women assumed greater responsibility to care for their families. With the exception of Quaker families, almost all Portsmouth men served some time in the American cause. Even those who were on the island during the Occupation were impressed into service by the British to work on fortifications on Butts Hill and elsewhere.
  6. When the British left the island they filled in just about every well – the source of water for families.

At the withdrawal of British troops in 1779, Portsmouth farm families had a difficult time getting their farms back into operation. Families listed their losses in hopes of getting some reparations. One of these lists is in the collection of the Portsmouth Historical Society. It gives us an idea of how devastating the household losses were. This list shows the losses of Edward Binney and Elizabeth Heffernan – in-laws who lived in a joint household just north of the Friends Meeting House on Quaker Hill.

Among the losses:

Livestock: 2 cows, one calf, 5 hogs, 12 goats, 1 jackass

5 acres of orchards, a cider press and mill, 4 acres of corn, 12 loads of hay,

Farm tools: An ox-cart, 3 hoes, forks, 2 spades

Household goods: desks, beds, drawers, wood cards, kettles, pots, gowns, tablecloths, etc.

It is clear that we should honor the brave Portsmouth women who cared for their families under such difficult circumstances.

North Battery, Newport – aka Fort Greene and Battery Park

Leave a comment

Battery Park in Newport is a lovely place to sit and view the harbor. From its name you can imagine that it was the site of a battery (a cluster of cannons) during the American War for Independence). The British called it North Battery and it was an important element in the defenses of Newport. British soldier Frederick Mackenzie writes in his diary in September of 1777 that they were doing the principal work “enclosing the town of Newport from Easton’s beach, round the three windmills, to the North Battery and extent of 3000 yards.”

The Battery began as an earthen work begun by American forces. The British re-enforced this so it could be manned by seven soldiers. In preparation for the arrival of the French fleet in 1778, the British thickened the walls and installed guns. The battery was part of the defenses to protect Newport from a sea attack and was armed with two 24-pound and three 12-pound cannons.

When the British abandoned Aquidneck Island in December of 1779, they leveled the fortifications at North Battery. The Americans tried to reconstruct the battery when they returned to the Aquidneck Island. The North Battery was re-named Fort Greene in 1798 in honor of Rhode Island’s General Nathanael Greene.

Resources: Kathy Abbass’ Rhode Tour:

https://rhodetour.org/items/show/54

“Plan of the town and environs of Newport, Rhode Island / Exhibiting its defenses formed before the 8th of August 1778 when the French fleet engaged and passed the batteries, the course of the French fleet up the harbor, the rebel attack and such defensive works as were erected since that day untill the 29th of August when the siege was raised; also the works proposed to be erected in the present year 1779..” https://quod.lib.umich.edu/w/wcl1ic/x-6052/wcl006125. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections.

Older Entries